Pages

Friday, 8 April 2022

There's Something Absurd About The Joker...

There are four key philosophies depicted, even if briefly or between the lines, in the 2018 movie "Joker:" nihilism, anarchy, absurdism, and existentialism. These are pretty hard to guess based on the names alone, so here's a quick rundown of each of them.

^ most people on the topic of philosophy ^

Nihilism - 
    Put simply, the idea of nothing matters and there's no point in trying to find a way to make it matter. Nihilism, as a very negative outlook on the meaning of life, can either be viewed as very pessimistic or very blunt and simple. Philosopher Friedrich Nietzche has often been associated with nihilism and the quote "God is dead[...] and we killed him." This idea of the death of God can fall under the umbrella of "values are baseless and meaning is pointless, nothing can be communicated or known," as nihilism is defined by the Intenet Encyclopedia of Philosophy's article on the topic.
    We see the ideas of nihilism play out in 'Joker,' though not necessarily in the forefront. The whole movie shows us Arther's descent into lawless disorder as he tries to search for meaning in his existence. As he continuously fails to find one and his mother is hospitalised after a stroke, he gives up and stops looking. We can see this change when he loses what's left of his humanity and shoots his mother.

Absurdism - 
    Nihilism with a sense of humour. Absurdism is the idea that there is no inherent meaning of the universe and that we, in our search for meaning, should accept that there is no humanly possible way to find it. The meaning and values of existence are logically possible but humanly impossible. However, while there is no inherent meaning, there is the possibility that one's search for meaning may in fact create its own meaning but death renders the pursuit redundant.

Existentialism - 
    In which free will allows us to govern our own meanings in life, and lead our own search in our existence. Existentialism believes that we are responsible for meaning, not a group of or any singular deities, not a government, not teachers, and not any other authority. According to ethics.org.au, "existentialism was popularised by Jean-Paul Sartre in the mid-20th century following the horrific events of World War II." Furthermore, the term 'existence precedes essence,' meaning we exist before we have meaning, was coined.

Anarchy -
   Anarchy is "[Screw] the Government" in one philosophy. It, in its basics, is scepticism of authority and power and a disbelief in the justifications that come with them. The theories support human equality and the ideal world of a community built on consensus without coercion. There are many varieties of anarchism, from political in which activists are protesting against a formed government, to theoretical in which all the beliefs are there but are understood to be an ideal.
    Anarchy plays a massive role in the latter acts of 'Joker,' as Thomas Wayne's own words are weaponised against him in the Gotham City clown riots. The uprising against Wayne only comes to light after he begins his mayoral campaign and, in retaliation to 3 of his employees being killed, calls those who can not hold their own jealous and "clowns." It's not only a rebelling force against the capitalistic platform that Wayne stands on, but the governing role he believes he deserves because of it. As the city falls into chaos, we see the much more violent side of anarchy play out through the lower class citizens in clown masks.


Thursday, 7 April 2022

Comedy is Subjective, Murray

Psychological. From the Greek words psukhē, meaning breath, mind, and soul, and logos, meaning speech, word, and reason. Psychological fiction, an uprising genre in both the gaming and movie worlds, is designed to hold up a mirror to reality and make us question the mentality of the characters placed before us. Todd Phillips’ Joker gives us a new psychological perspective on an already beloved character by placing him in the shoes of ‘Arthur Fleck,’ a lowlife in the midst of 1980s Gotham. Throughout the film, certain film aspects are used to portray the idea of a mental illness and allow the viewer to feel that same experience

In arguably the climax of the film, we are shown what seems to be the breaking point of Arthur’s mental stability.  In this scene, Arthur is sitting on a subway. With him are three Wayne employees, who are clearly drunk, and a young lady being harassed by the three guys as she tries to read. All Arthur is able to do is watch as these men are rendered unable to take a hint. They begin throwing chips at her, and she looks over to Arthur for help. This is when Arthur’s laughing condition (pseudobulbar affect, PBA) kicks in. With Arthur distracting the men, the lady is able to move into another car of the subway, leaving the four alone together. Offended by his laughter, the men confront him and begin singing “Send in The Clowns.” Things begin to escalate as the men start beating up Arthur, and he pulls his gun on him. He shoots the first two in self-defence, but something clicks in him as the third runs away. Rather than letting him run, Arthur chases him down, closing in on him as he heads for the staircase out of the subway. 6 shots. Arthur shoots the final Wayne employee, emptying the gun of bullets.

Directors love to make us uncomfortable, and Phillips is no exception. In order to put us in the mindset of Arthur, the setting around him reflects his mental state and the decisions that lead him to become the Joker. Some fundamental aspects in this scene lead to this discomfort, including lighting, non-diegetic sound as in music and sound effects, acting as in dialogue and body language, and camera movement. 


Lighting is an important aspect of any scene, as it can change the entire mood with the literal flip of a switch. We see a certain type of lighting in the subway, called compact fluorescent light bulbs (CFLs). CFLs were commercialised in the 80s when the Joker takes place, so we’re able to assume these fluorescent lights were very common in places like the Gotham City transit. These lights are tinged with green, giving the subway this grunge and dirtiness. Imagine being in a dark theatre watching this scene, the green tinge lights up the room and suddenly you’re in the subway too. You feel the tension and everything is ten times worse. 

Furthermore, there have been studies conducted on the effect of fluorescent lights on people with anxiety. One study published by Cureus in 2021 concluded that “Fluorescent light reminds anxiety participants of negative aspects more than healthy participants.” So not only do these lights have an effect on us as an audience but on Arthur himself, creating the perfect situation for a violent outburst. It’s not hard to assume that Arthur is vulnerable to an anxiety or panic disorder as it’s clear he is depressed and depression and anxiety are comorbid conditions. 

These factors are only heightened by the flickering of the subway lights. Flickering lights in films are often used to create instability, drama or tension. So by adding these on top of the already disgusting and uneasy lighting, Arthur is not only thrown into a house of discomfort and triggers but we are too.

This scene accurately reflects and links the film to what it’s like to live in New York. Gotham has always been a commentary on New York City, and in this movie particularly we see a lot of parallels. For example, there is the rat population problem, the garbage strike of ‘81, but most importantly the NYC transit or “subway.” The real-life subway is rarely cleaned, as it would require shutting down entire trains at a time, leaving it disgusting and grimy. So the green and dirty look of the Gotham subway was used to also reflect this.


Have you ever been watching a horror film and a high pitched ringing plays in the background of a really tense scene? Or a low, sustained rumble that plays over numerous shots? You may not realise it, but these sustained notes are actually what can create this feeling of tension within the audience when nothing significant is happening on screen. Known as the “drone of dread,” these sounds are non-diegetic sound effects used in thriller and horror movies like Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey, David Lynch’s Eraserhead, and John Carpenter’s The Thing to signify the presence of danger or a fracturing reality. They are unnerving noises purposefully placed into a scene to get a rise from audiences.

Phillips uses a higher-pitched version of this drone at the end of the subway scene. It fades in as Arthur fires the last two rounds of his gun into the back of the final Wall Street guy. It becomes much clearer as we’re given a close up of Arthur’s face, giving the indication that this is a sound that he is hearing. Using this sound, the audience is just as affected by the killings as Arthur is. The drone conjures up anxiety and tension anyone would feel after killing three people, as it is designed to do. Just as the lighting has an effect on the audience, this drone puts us in Arthurs’s shoes. It also signifies that something is very very wrong and, as TV Tropes in their article on the drone of dread says, “something very wrong or unusual is going on under the fragile surface of reality.” This is exactly what we see in this scene. Arthur’s relationship with reality is cracking, and he doesn’t even seem to realise he’s murdered people until he starts to run, which is after the drone begins to die down.

Watching the film, you may not have even realised there was a drone, or if you did, you wouldn’t have realised it was a “drone of dread.” The drone itself, as a sound, is very obvious, but at first glance (first listen?) it’s just the ringing of Arthur’s ears after shooting his gun so many times. This is also true, as any sound above 85dB is considered to be damaging to your hearing. A quick Google search will tell you that gunshots are 170dB at their worst, compared to a loud concert at 120dB, quite literally twice as loud as the baseline for hearing damage. This is just an extremely clever way for Phillips to hide an audio drone in a scene such as this.

To only intensify the effect, music is added into the background and begins to swell as the scene ramps up. Multiple sources, such as Psychology Today, and Inside Science, discuss how music connects to our brains both emotionally and behaviorally. It is able to stimulate emotion regulators and neurotransmitters, so placing music behind any scene can change how it affects its audience. For example, a YouTube channel called Loud Son took the introduction scene of The Lion King and changed the music behind it. Happier, higher tempo songs made it seem like a comedy or that something good was happening. Songs with more strings and lower notes gave off an ominous storyline. Something similar happens with the soundtrack of the subway shooting scene in the Joker. 

If you isolate the original soundtrack (OST) from the scene, you’re able to audibly hear the tension start to rise, as the dynamics (the volume of the instruments and/or vocals) increase in volume. There’s a slower tempo and lower notes, two key concepts in creating a darker themed OST. Strings are common audio cues, most notably the short sharp violin screeches associated with Alfred Hitchcock's Psycho, in horrors and thrillers as a sign of something insane or evil, similar to the drone of dread. These are used in the OST of Joker too, a lot slower and deeper, but with the same effect. The OST of this scene digs into our subconscious to tell us that, even though at the beginning this is just a regular subway ride with a couple of douchebags harassing a young lady, there may be something else afoot. We are stuck in Arthur’s mind as he continuously fights his own mind and loses touch with reality and eventually falls victim to his mental health. The ramp-up and fall of the music simulate this and take us and our emotions along for the ride.


What is a good psychological thriller if not emotionally effective? The subway shooting scene is only one of many scenes within the Joker leaving audiences feeling uneasy. Mental illness and criminal insanity can feel disconnected from our own reality and by using significant film aspects, Todd Phillips is able to reconnect us to people like Arthur Fleck, who see the world so differently. There is an entire emotional world and individual story built from the soundtrack alone, tethering our conscious and subconscious minds to Arthur’s as he faces the Joker’s origin story. The lighting of each scene was extremely purposeful in its intent to throw us into 1980s Gotham, with that little side commentary of both 1980s and modern-day New York City. By watching this film, we’re asked to look into a mirror and see what is reflected. There is a mental health crisis in New Zealand as people whose symptoms aren’t considered “bad enough” are shoved to the side until they are a danger to themselves or others and we are explicitly shown the worst-case scenario of these actions through this film. If there was one overarching message of 2019’s Joker, it was to be kind to others. You never know what they are going through.



My sources, if you're interested in reading more about anything I mentioned :)


Determining dramatic intensification via flashing lights in movies

Send In the Clowns - Wikipedia

Why that drone sound in movies gives you anxiety

Drone of Dread - TV Tropes

How Music Affects Film #17: The Lion King

Music, Emotion, and Well-Being | Psychology Today.

Why does music make us emotional? | Inside Science

Harmful Noise Levels.

Gunfire and hearing loss - how damaging is it?

Determining dramatic intensification via flashing lights in movies

Subway | Joker OST

"Psycho" Strings - TV Tropes

Psycho Full Violin Screech


Friday, 6 August 2021

In Other News, My Brain is Actually Melting

Let's talk about nerd shit. We recently finished a l̶o̶n̶g̶ day of English-based workshops within school with our English teachers. There were 4 topics we spent the day looking at an overview of. These are as follows: Narrative Theory, Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Shakespeare. During narrative theory, a particular narrative strategy was mentioned and it got my brain cogs turning.

Have you ever heard of Chekhov's gun? If you followed the L'Manburg saga on Youtube, you've at least heard about it, even if you don't understand it. If you haven't heard of it, it's not too difficult to understand. It's basically the principle in stories that every element mentioned or shown has some sort of significance in the plot. You'd think this would go against red herrings but I believe that red herrings may not have significance in the plot necessarily, they do have a very significant role in storytelling. Anyway, it's believed that, due to this principle, elements should not be included in a narrative without having some sort of use. 

Does that make any sense? No? Well, here's an example.

In the series I previously mentioned, Wilbur Soot has... mentally deteriorated. Despite this, Wilbur is the storyteller of the series. At this point, he has built a country, 'L'Manburg' by hand, won independence and lost the country to democracy. He believes that the only thing he can do is destroy what L'Manburg has become under the joint rule of a drunk and a stoner. Manburg. As he is explaining how he has placed a country worth of dynamite underneath the land, his confidant, Tommy, is trying to talk him out of it. This is where Wilbur references Chekhov's gun. He has been talking about blowing up the country for so long, it's almost worse to not. He is aware of his audience, those who stood beside the plan for destruction, and knows that he has indirectly made a promise to them that something will be blown up.
Just by mentioning the mere idea of the plan, you then expect said plan to be thought out. Why would a storyteller mention, and describe, a plan, without running it through?

Why show a gun without the intention of firing it?

Monday, 5 July 2021

I've Connected The Dots!

It's the last few weeks of term 2. We're starting our connections assessment and we're starting it strong. The following is a brief summary of the themes throughout the texts we have studied up to this point.



Monday, 29 March 2021

We Did It, Reddit


Imagine this:
Look at this seccy beast
(it's me, okay, I'm allow to say it)

    It's 9 years ago. 2012. You're year 3 me. It's the first year you've ever done acting for- anything really. It's performance night, after 3 and half terms of rehearsal, and you've just performed your silent Christmas piece and you're getting ready to go on stage with your best friend within the group to say, and I quote,
        "And now, for a Shakespearean interlude."

    Now, fast forward a few years, you're a year 7 now. It's 2016, 5 years ago. A new school, new people, new opportunities. The Shakespeare Festival has been in the notices for a while and you decide, screw it, let's try it out. You end up doing the Tempest, and it's so much fun. You're ecstatic after sectionals because you found out you were going to regionals. It's the biggest achievement you could think of.


    
The next year, in year 8, you end up performing as "Prologue" from A Midsummer Night's Dream. Only now do you realise that all those years ago, in year 3, you did one of the scenes that stars these same characters. You've come full circle. You don't do as well competition-wise, but it's still fun, regardless of how salty you are in your narration role.
    Now fast forward to this year. You're year 12 now, in your second year of NCEA, and your sixth year of high school. You've done the same Sheliah Winn Shakespeare Festival for the five years before now and you've only done one student-directed piece, the year prior with Taming Of The Shrew. The student directing that piece, one of your friends, steps down from participating. Directing isn't her thing. You still want to do a student-directed piece but you have no director. So you ask yourself the question-
        "What if I did it?"

    You studied A Midsummer Night's Dream basically all year in L
evel One, you can recite the plot inside out, let's do that one. Your friends are incredible actresses, they can handle anything. Plus, in Level Two, there's a directing standard. And thus, you began to plan.

    
    A month and half later, on the 27th of March, 2021, you perform.
You're only in it for 40 seconds but that only means you're able to watch from the wings and see just how amazing your friends have become in the last 5 years. Though you've convinced yourself that nationals wasn't in sight, they were still bloody incredible.

   
    This lack of confidence only leads to surprise. It turns out you end up being the only 15 minute piece going through from your regionals. You're going to Wellington with some of your best friends. You're amazed and confused and scared. Is this really happening?
    This actually happened last saturday. This isn't some hypothetical with some moral outcome you'll forget about in a few hours. This is our reality. Nadia, Meagan, Jess, and I are going to Wellington in June for the Globe Theatre, University Of Otago, Sheliah Winn Shakespeare Festival. We get to participate in tours, workshops, and more! It's crazy and unbelievable!

    Somebody pinch me!


(P.s - In reference to the title)

Wednesday, 3 March 2021

Look, I Have a Headache I Can't Comprehend The Matter of Time And Space Right Now.

What is a human? Where is a human? Who is a human? Why is a human?
I genuinely have no idea how to define a human. It's not as easy as a single concept. The things that make us human can't be boiled down into a couple sentences. Unless you're google, then the definition of a human is "relating to or characteristic of humankind." or "a human being." which really doesn't help the confusingness of the how situation. 

What is a person? 
The google definition of 'person' is a human being categorised as an individual. When I'm thinking about it, it's like a human is the genetics, the biology, the DNA of it all. But a person is in the mind, the sociology, the psychology of it all.

What are your thoughts on Sandra the Orangutan receiving personhood?
Dude that's epic.